Risks of failing to offer redeployment to an employee
Q: We are restructuring our HR department as we no longer require one of the roles to be performed, but we do require a new role that we will introduce.
We plan to make the current role redundant and recruit someone into the new role.The size and scope of the new role will be reduced, and the salary will be significantly lower that the redundant role. Are we obliged to offer the team member in the redundant position the new role?
We intend to recruit externally to find a suitably qualified candidate, and plan to offer either a redundancy package or an opportunity to apply for the new role to the current employee. Will this fulfill our obligations to the redundant employee?
A: The primary concern in this case is that the employee may lodge an unfair dismissal claim on the basis that the redundancy is not a genuine redundancy. If this occurs, the Fair Work Commission will consider whether or not it was reasonable for you to redeploy the employee to the new role. If it was reasonable and redeployment was not offered, this can mean that the redundancy wasn’t a genuine redundancy for unfair dismissal purposes.
The redeployment obligation extends to what is “reasonable in all the circumstances”. This differs on a case-by-case basis, but generally you should not fail to offer an employee a role that they have the appropriate skills to perform, even if it is lower in status or pay. Please note that inviting an employee to apply for a position that is subject to a competitive process, i.e. that you are interviewing others for, would not satisfy the redeployment requirement.
Please note: The answer is correct at the time of publishing. Be aware that laws may change over time. Refer to Redundancy and retrenchment for current advice.
Get the latest employment law news, legal updates, case law and practical advice from our experts sent straight to your inbox every week.